John wrote:

Replacing known good filter capacitors is a zero-sum exercise at best. New aluminum electrolytics are relatively expensive, and you'll be replacing parts that are probably near the bottom of their bathtub-shaped reliability curves with parts that are definitely on the left side of theirs.

* * * After my first few encounters with high-ESR parts out of the retail box, I stopped replacing good ones.

I have no actual statistics to offer in support of either side of the question, but in my own case, it certainly hasn't cost me anything to leave good electrolytics alone.

I basically concur with John. You can get good, reliable aluminum electrolytics, but you need the sort of Q/C knowledge that hobbyists rarely have. HP/Agilent has a fine reputation for sourcing good parts, and very rarely has been caught out by batches of bad parts (unlike some other well-thought-of test equipment makers). So the parts in your 3586 and 5370 are likely about as good as you can do. I would NOT recommend shotgun replacement, absent evidence that your particular 3586 or 5370 was a victim of a batch of bad parts, and one failure -- regardless of how spectacular -- does not constitute such evidence. For that matter, do you have actual forensic evidence that a capacitor failure caused the damage, or is that just a guess based on what you think is the likliest suspect? Perhaps it was a diode (as in a spectacularly-smoked 5345 of mine) or other component.

It is very rare for a failed electrolytic to cause the devastating damage that your 3586 suffered, so replacing them on an as-fail basis is a much better strategy. Don't let the shock value of the magnitude of the damage blind you to a rational analysis of the probability and potential severity of future failures.

Finally, I would caution against wholesale replacement of tantalum caps with aluminum electrolytics. Tantalums have a number of different properties compared to aluminum electrolytics, and it is not always obvious which difference led the designer to choose the tantalum for any particular location. So, even if one decides to shotgun the electrolytic capacitors in a unit, it is probably best to replace tantalums with tantalums. Even the best, low-ESR aluminum electrolytic may not do the job if the designer chose the tantalum for reasons other than low ESR. Do you consider yourself to be a designer of sufficient talent and experience to second-guess an HP design team? (I'm not suggesting that nobody is -- just asking if you are confident that you are.)

Best regards,

Charles









_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to