On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:17 AM, gary <[email protected]> wrote: > I built a small form factor PC using the Intel D525. > >> >> http://ark.intel.com/products/49490/Intel-Atom-processor-D525-%281M-Cache-1_80-GHz%29 >> > > If you look at the features (or lack thereof!), it lacks "turbo boost" and > "enhanced Intel Speed Step technology". So you may not have to resort to > using a uP if you don't want the PC clock to be a moving target. I was a > bit surprised that the Atoms (at least to that generation) didn't play > clock and core voltage games. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
If the architecture has cache or wait states, it is still subject to be a moving target. I'm naturally skeptical on all architectures that have multiple channels, show me an architecture with cache or waits states and i'll show you a problem ( in regards to real time, that is) I stand firm that the only proper way to do this is with a 100% deterministic architecture. Steve _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
