If the company that developed the format has a lead on tying up the IP for
marketing the new format so that others cannot play, then yes, there is a
problem. Really!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly
In message <[email protected]>, Clint Turner writes:
In reviewing the NIST document, I don't see anything particularly
difficult about the new format - either in terms of extracting the time
or phase/frequency information from the transmissions.
As a somewhat seasoned VLF SDR radio-nut, I must admit that I find
the yelling of bloody murder over a so simple and well documented
transmission format.
Class action suit because they *improve* your VLF time/freq reference
signal and document the new format ?
Really ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
