David it was humor Regards On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, David <[email protected]> wrote:
> What aspects of USB would HP have used? Just the complexity of a USB > OHCI/UHCI would have been economically prohibitive compared to an > asynchronous serial UART. An OHCI/UHCI is more like an ethernet > controller and those took up the space of entire expansion boards > initially. > > What they did come up with was HP-IB although I would have preferred > it to be serial and galvanically isolated. > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:28:46 -0400, paul swed <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >I have never figured out why HP did not develop USB in 1969? Not very far > >sighted. ;-) > >Regards > >Paul > >WB8TSL > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
