Hi Again, I'd say it's the lowest common denominator. Synchronous comm using RS-232 levels on a DB-25 came before asynchronous comm. It's long dead. Being first isn't *always* best. Same could be said of 125V / 60 ma current loops. I suspect serial will easily outlive RS-232 levels though.
Bob -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Tharp Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic etc On 10/10/2012 11:49 AM, Bob Camp wrote: > No easy solution. Serial com is still with us because it's a lowest common > denominator. I'm sitting here coding it into a new product right now (once > the uber super compiler finishes a build). It's supported on just about > every chip set in the universe. I suspect it will outlive the cockroaches. Basic serial has its merits, but it's regrettable that RS-232 came out on top. RS-422 (or full-duplex RS-485, not much difference) would have been a much better choice. Differential so it has good noise resistance, and it doesn't use weird voltages (-12V? come on...) It all looks the same from the software side though. Bytes in, bytes out. -- m. tharp _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
