Hi That approach works well. If you have them about a half second apart I'd stick with that setup.
Bob On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Fabio Eboli <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Bob, the next logging session will > be setup as per your suggestion. > > Now I'm logging with the counter > in time interval, Rb 1 is the start, > GPS is the stop and Rb2 is the ext > reference. The pulses are 670mS apart now. > > Fabio. > > Bob Camp <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> Hi >> >> Yes, I would run the FE5680 into the counter's frequency standard input. > >> >> For the "real data", you can set up the counter to start on the GPS pps and >> stop on the 10 MHz output from the FE5680. You will only have 100 ns of >> range. You can unscramble the data after the fact. If you don't want to >> unscramble things, divide the 10 MHz down to 100 Hz and put that into the >> stop channel. >> >> Lots of fun. >> >> Bob > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
