I'm on the road right now and don't have access to any data to support or expand upon this statement but I've found that a passive splitter out performs both of my hp 5087 distribution amps as long as you can live with the signal loss. In turn I recall that using the distribution amps worked better for me for than daisy chaining connections via t connectors. I doubt the differences would be meaningful in most real world applications.
It seems reasonable to me that a passive splitter would out perform an active device of unknown heritage (both my distribution amps came from the usual auction site.) Your results may vary (: _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
