Ed, et al,

I was just cleaning up the workbench and this gave me time to reflect of the 
FRK repair.
I'd just like to say thanks for your help and Guidance Ed, without it, I 
probably would have got there in the end but I would have not been as aware of 
why and how I fixed it.
What I mean is, I learnt a great deal about how the Rubidium works AND I learnt 
that sometimes patience is the best recourse when dealing with very accurate 
timing instruments AND I made some very cool friends!

With that mess out of the way, I realised, heck, I haven't fixed the PSU in the 
9390 yet!

So, Ed, what do you know about "Convertor Concepts INC." 28volt switch mode PSU 
used in the 9390? ;)

So far, I have found the Triac was blown, but I don't have the schematic for 
the PSU.
The construction although acceptable and tidy is a bit "Ghetto" compared to 
modern day switch modes I have worked on.
Mind you, there is a lot more room in there and you can actually get in there 
and fix things without having to remove heat sinks and separate boards.

However, I am toying with the idea of replacing it with one of those new high 
efficiency / low noise supplies.

I suppose I should just put the 9390 on the bench and hook it up to a bench 
supply and watch it for a while.

Then again, I am also admiring the view - I can actually see the surface of the 
bench for a change - no mat of cables obscuring it!

I guess it's only right I should at least attempt to fix the original PSU, if 
even just to keep the old 'gal just like new.
And it is in lovely condition! I'd say it spent its working life in a nice 
clean room.


BR,
-marki


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Ed Palmer
Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013 3:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 9390 GPS RX


On 5/29/2013 10:14 PM, Mark C. Stephens wrote:
> Ah, The old Section 2 part (in Don Adams voice)
>
> Okay, I have been watching the timer out of the corner of my eye, and there 
> is a trend.
> The TI difference gradually falls down to about 3ns (good) then shoots up to 
> 103ns (bad) and then slowly falls down to 3ns in just over an hour, it then 
> shoots up to 103ns again and repeats the process.
>
> This is why I get good readings for short term.
>
> The frequency can't be out that much, surely?

No, that's okay.  Nothing wrong at all.  The frequency of the FRK is slightly 
different from the 10 MHz out of the GPSDO.  Over a period of just over an 
hour, it drifts 1 cycle which, at 10 MHz, is 100 ns.  So the time interval goes 
from being 103 ns (think of it as being 360 degrees out of phase), gradually 
falls to 3 ns (in phase) and then jumps to 103 ns (360 degrees out of phase).  
This is called 'phase wrapping'  
If you connect the FRK and the GPSDO to the channels of a dual-trace scope in 
parallel with the counter you can watch the drift.  (Talk about
boring!)  If you manage to stay awake, you'll see that when the counter is 
reporting a 50 ns time interval, the two waveforms are 180 degrees out of 
phase.  Why the extra 3 ns?  Because the 5370B has trouble dealing with signals 
that are that close together and gets a little confused.  If I did the math 
right, you're looking at a frequency offset in the range of 3e-11 which is 
better than the original spec for the FRK frequency error. Well done!

Timelab or Plotter or Stable32 (I assume) takes care of these phase wraps.  In 
Timelab, if you click on Measurement -> Phase Difference
(Original) you'll see the sawtooth pattern.  If you click on Phase Difference 
(Unwrapped) you'll see how Timelab takes the angled parts of the sawtooth and 
sticks them together in a straight line by 'unwrapping' 
the phase wraps.  It then analyzes the straight line.

If you were to nudge the frequency of the FRK a bit, you'd see that the time 
between phase wraps would increase as you came closer to 10 MHz.  
Actually, it would be a pain to watch for that so you'd just watch for the 
counter to increment or decrement more slowly.  But there's no point in doing 
that because you're just going to put it back in the 9390.

> Anyway, as you say, Put it in the 9390 and see if 9390 can phase-lock it.
>
> That certainly will be interesting if it does!

I can almost guarantee that it will.  It will use the EFC to nudge the 
frequency of the FRK so that it is EXACTLY 10.000 000 000 000 000 MHz.  
Well, maybe not quite that many zeros. :)  And it will keep nudging the EFC to 
keep the frequency there as the FRK slowly drifts.  So there won't be a 
frequency difference.  That's what a GPSDO does.

Ed


>
> -marki
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Ed Palmer
> Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013 3:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 9390 GPS RX
>
>
> On 5/29/2013 9:58 AM, Mark C. Stephens wrote:
>> Uh, well. No one told me about the heatsink thing :)
> Section 2 in the manual talks about mounting and heatsinking.  You mean you 
> didn't read the flippin' manual??? ;)  Anyway, it's good that you were able 
> to get it on frequency.
>
>> I am using a HP5370B.
>> I am comparing to my best GPSDO.
>> For instance my 5x Z3805A's get down to the low -12's after 1 hour.
> Remember what these measurements mean.  Result = sqrt(<measurement
> system>^2 + DUT^2 + Reference^2).  Your measurement system and reference
> have to be significantly better than the DUT or they will affect the result.  
> The 5370B should be low enough to be ignored at these Tau values.  Your 
> Z3805A should be okay, I think, but not by much.  My Z3801A happens to have a 
> 'disciplining hump' that peaks at around 1000 sec. and was affecting the 
> measurement at 800 sec.  I was also using a 5370B.
>
>> 4.7e-11 at 1 hour 12 minutes.
> Yeah, that's high considering that the monthly drift is supposed to be less 
> than that!  Let it soak for a month and see what happens.
>
>> Do you think the FRK is ready to go back in the 9390 :) I hope so, I
>> like that 9390 and I want it in my rack :)
> Yes, I think so.  Like I said, see what monitoring capability the 9390 has.  
> I suspect that the FRK will improve over the next while. Only time will tell 
> how much.
>
> Congratulations!  It looks like your FRK is alive!  After a little time to 
> work out the last few kinks it should be in good shape. (Knock on
> wood!)  :)
>
> Ed
>

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to