Hi

The way doppler is corrected on a normal GPS is by having a large body of 
orbital data for each sat measured by a bunch of stations and then processed 
into the almanac. It's not a trivial process.

Since the doppler is in the hundred Hz or so range, I'd bet the conversion 
oscillator was designed to a similar spec. There may also be other issues as 
well. 

You would do *much* better for far less money simply using the same data 
collection process to do common view GPS with normal gear.

Bob

On Jul 4, 2013, at 3:06 AM, Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> [email protected] said:
>> If the WAAS sats were purpose designed to provide a high accuracy carrier,
>> then yes there are ways to do it. The fundamental design concept of a "bent
>> pipe" is that you don't do any of that. You do not care what's going through
>> the bird, it just maps the input frequencies to the output and amplifies
>> them (a lot). Again, the WAAS signal is simply piggybacking on existing
>> hardware. The conversion oscillator is not locked to the GPS carrier (or to
>> any other carrier). It's simply a free running quartz based oscillator,
>> running into a synthesizer to get the appropriate microwave frequency.  
> 
> If somebody wanted to use that path for a frequency reference, they could 
> setup a ground station to measure the Doppler and distribute that so people 
> could adjust their expectations.
> 
> I suspect measuring the Doppler is a common sanity check.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to