Bob,
Sorry, I'm not sure, if I've understood the issue - what exactly did you
wrong?
Thank you
Volker
Am 08.07.2013 14:48, schrieb Robert Darby:
John,
After a night's sleep and a rereading of your post I finally realized
what I was doing wrong. I did not understand the the role of the
sampling interval setting and the display rate setting on the 5370.
When I follow the process below the results are totally consistent.
Sorry to taken your time and thanks all for your help. Now to find
the original issue.....
Bob Darby
On 7/7/2013 8:57 PM, John Miles wrote:
So the only difference between the test setups is the setting of the
Display Rate control on the 5370, correct? You're allowing TimeLab to
estimate the sample rate automatically, and giving it enough time to
converge on a stable reading before hitting 'Start Measurement'?
You're correct in that changing the real-world sample rate should
yield results that are identical (or at least very similar) to
resampling the phase data after the fact. In frequency mode, dead
time between readings would make that an iffy proposition, but for
data taken in TI mode the outcomes should be close. -- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
