No prob! It's a complicated business. -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Robert Darby > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 5:48 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Question about effect of sample interval on ADEV > > John, > > After a night's sleep and a rereading of your post I finally realized > what I was doing wrong. I did not understand the the role of the > sampling interval setting and the display rate setting on the 5370. > When I follow the process below the results are totally consistent. > > Sorry to taken your time and thanks all for your help. Now to find the > original issue..... > > Bob Darby > > On 7/7/2013 8:57 PM, John Miles wrote: > > So the only difference between the test setups is the setting of the > > Display Rate control on the 5370, correct? You're allowing TimeLab to > > estimate the sample rate automatically, and giving it enough time to > > converge on a stable reading before hitting 'Start Measurement'? > > You're correct in that changing the real-world sample rate should > > yield results that are identical (or at least very similar) to > > resampling the phase data after the fact. In frequency mode, dead time > > between readings would make that an iffy proposition, but for data > > taken in TI mode the outcomes should be close. -- john, KE5FX Miles > > Design LLC > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time- > nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
