Hi > On Dec 5, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [email protected] said: >> Also, yes, the 68000 latency most likely required an FPGA's real time >> capabilities. > > The 68000 was "just" a CPU. It didn't have the typical counter/timers (or > other IO gear) that are found in many modern chips targeted at the embedded > market. Today, you can probably get everything you need on an Arm SOC. > That's ROM/Flash, RAM, counter/timer and UART.
…… remember … you also need to do a high precision TDC in there somewhere and sync it up to both the GPS and the local pps. There’s more to it than just a simple divider. There’s also multiple clock domains, something that MCU’s rarely are happy with. Bob > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
