Hi

One of our standing jokes when we lived by the shore was that we actually 
lived underwater. The GPS routinely put is 30 to 50’ below sea level ….

Bob

> On May 20, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Björn Gabrielsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
> You are confusing the readers here.
> 
>  1) zero altitude relative the WGS84/GPS ellipsoid are often tens of
> meters over or below sea level, depending on your location.
> 
>  2) zero altitude relative to a geoid (EGM96 or something else) is very
> close to sea level.
> 
> Then if you think of the ellipsoid as a second order model of the geoid...
> we can start comfusing people again.
> 
> --
> 
>    Björn
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> The gotcha is that the GPS numbers are related to a geoid model and not to
>> sea level.
>> You can indeed find points that are “underwater” based on the geoid,
>> but quite dry in
>> real life (and vice-versa).
>> 
>> Bob
>>> On May 19, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Demian Martin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would buy that (Google Maps being off) except that I'm less than 2
>>> miles from the SF bay and -5M would have me underwater. That may well
>>> happen but not for a few years at least. Also the Arbiter does match
>>> Google maps pretty closely. It doesn't really matter a lot, just a
>>> curiosity.
>>>    Demian
>>> 
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:12:58 -0400
>>>> From: Bob Camp <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>>     <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Height Error
>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>> 
>>>> The simple answer is that Google maps may or may not be correct. There
>>>> are a lot
>>>> of examples of them being off by 10M or more. That said, my *guess*
>>>> would be that the
>>>> Thunderbolt is closer to the truth.
>>> 
>>>> Bob
>>> 
>>>> On May 18, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Demian Martin <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I have 2 GPSDO's. A Thunderbolt and an Arbiter 1083A. The Arbiter is
>>>> old but
>>>> it works fine (and has a Wenzel 5 MHz streamline oscillator in it). It
>>>> has
>>>> the 1995 firmware issue, and I could get new firmware for it ($$) but
>>>> I'm
>>>> not using it as a clock, just a frequency source.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I just moved and have re-setup both. They share an antenna. I got both
>>>> to do
>>>> a self survey. The Arbiter was really close to what Google maps
>>>> indicate is
>>>> my location. The Thunderbolt was about the same except it has me
>>>> underground. The arbiter has the height as +30M. The Thunderbolt as
>>>> -6M.
>>>> What setting do I have wrong in the Thunderbolt? Would it affect the
>>>> operation as a frequency standard in any way?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Demian Martin
>>>> 
>>>> San Leandro, CA 94577
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to