Hi

Depending on which chip you are using and how big it is, you can get into the 
150 to
500 ps range running a carry chain as a TDC.That’s without getting into things 
like
hand routing and temperature / voltage issues. 

How big a chip you need will be a function of how high you can get the internal 
PLL
to run while packing a bunch of stuff in the chip. If you can hit 400 MHz, each 
carry 
chain will need to handle a bit more than 2.5 ns, but probably less than 5 ns. 
You 
can do that with a carry chain a few hundred bits long. 

There is a bit of handwaving already so this is indeed a guess rather than a 
design. 
If you run 320 bit chains and 8 inputs, you will need 2.5K registers for the 
carry chains. 
You also will need about 200 registers for the support of each chain, so that 
adds another
1.6K registers. Something in the 5K register range is a possible way to go for 
8 inputs.

Bob
 
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 2:04 AM, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Alan Ambrose <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> How about a 1pS resolution TIC? :)
>> 
>> Or a >12 digit frequency counter? :) :)
>> 
>> It's not a proper time-nut project unless there's a nutty element...
> 
> Well, how complex? Front end with a fast ADC and make a DSP DMTD device?
> 
> In terms of simpler things that (AFAIK) one can't go out and buy:  a
> TIC with 4 or 8 inputs would be an interesting piece of time nut
> gear.even if it was 'just' 1ns resolution
> 
> Surplus lab TICs are easily had but become quite a pile of equipment
> when you want to concurrently measure a half dozen oscillators.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to