-------- In message <55a4ac81.1030...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>The safety is >relative, in that it takes quite a bit of more infrastructure compared >to the jamming of GPS, and that lies in the wavelength of the signal >than anything else. If the goal is a reliable backup for GPS, there are smarter ways to use the 100kHz band than Loran-C pulses, and there really isn't much reason to stay compatible with Loran-C receivers. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
