Hi

Bottom line:

This is why you often see spur specs stated with a lower frequency limit (like 
250Hz) or 
an exclusion for line related spurs. 

One really fun one not (yet) mentioned: 

All of those motors in the building are rotating at line frequency. You don’t 
just have an 
electromagnetic field. You can have an acoustic / vibration field as well. 
Probably not a big 
deal, but it’s there ….

Bob

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:45 PM, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Bob the VLF guys in Europe can receive the 60Hz signal over here! so you 
> probably needed a test site on the far side of the Moon :-))
> Alan
> G3NYK
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Camp" <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OXCO Spurious Output at Line Frequencies
> 
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> The “practical” solution often is to ship it to an office of the same 
>> company that happens
>> to have 60 Hz power. The spur moves to 60 / 120 / 180 and they move on with 
>> their
>> evaluation.
>> 
>> I have also played the “let’s do it with batteries" approach. Screen rooms 
>> were of little benefit.
>> Simply running test gear on batteries did not do the job. Ultimately we 
>> wound up in the
>> middle of an Illinois corn field with a bunch of gear modified to run purely 
>> on batteries. The
>> spur did go down, but it never fully went away.  It’s been 40 years since 
>> that adventure so I
>> really could not say just how far down we got it ….
>> 
>> Anything past -120 db at line frequency is in the “don’t bother” category.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Martyn Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> I have a customer who is measuring the phase noise of my 10 MHz ultra-low 
>>> phase noise frequency standard.
>>> 
>>> He is seeing spurious signals at line frequencies (50 and 100 Hz as we are 
>>> in Europe) at a level around -130 dBc.
>>> 
>>> My opinion is that it's impossible to get much better than that.  Even 
>>> running on batteries make little difference, since the equipment is in a 
>>> test rack with AC signals everywhere.
>>> 
>>> Even the £50k R&S test set he is using only quotes a spurious spec of -90 
>>> dBc.
>>> 
>>> What experience does anyone have here?
>>> 
>>> Best Regards
>>> 
>>> Martyn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to