Forgive my naivete, but if this is something as simple as the t'bolt adding a 10 bit number to a base date, could not the base date be changed in the PROM? (Presuming one can get to it, etc) Though I suspect that might not be all that simple of course. And I'm not taking mine apart to look. :)
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Dave B via time-nuts <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. > > What about NTPD implementations, when using a TB as the reference time > source? Does that handle the week count roll over as well? If that was > added, from what version? > > I suspect I may have some updating to do! I use a TB as a frequency > ref' and local NTP/NTPD server reference. > > The local TB here is showing "week 1959" top left of LH's display window > (Rev 5.01) > > Cheers. > > Dave G0WBX. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > On 28/07/17 08:14, [email protected] wrote: > >> Well quite an unpleasant surprise. So after the 30th do the TBolts stop > > Paul, > > > > This topic has been covered a number of times over the years. Some > time-nuts have even run TBolt's under GPS simulators to verify that the 10 > MHz and 1PPS outputs will be fine. So apparently the only effect is that > the date & time (in binary TSIP messages) are off by 1024 weeks. This > rollover-related effect is by now a "common" issue with many GPS receivers. > > > > The current version of Mark's Lady Heather program has code to detect > this and fix it so you're good to go for the next 19.6 years. > > > > /tvb > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
