> Do you recall what the amplitude of the input signal to the Wenzel shaper > was? > > Since I used a 1:2 (3dB) terminated splitter for my measurements the input > to the splitter is the same as the Timepod reference signal amplitude >
I was using a similar setup, so the shaper input would have been +4 to +5 dBm. My intention at the time was probably to feed it a signal comparable to the lowest levels commonly seen from typical 10 MHz sources. It may or may not do better at higher input levels, but it'll obviously get worse once the level goes below a certain point. -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
