Hi

This gets into the “other side” of the whole comparator / squaring circuit test 
process. 
What matters for ADEV and what matters for phase noise at 100KHz offset likely 
are
not the same thing. A lot of circuits do quite well inside 100 Hz, but not so 
well above
that offset. 

Driving a 5V powered CMOS gate with 5.5V p-p does a pretty good job ….

Bob

> On Oct 3, 2017, at 10:11 PM, Mark Sims <hol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am using the simplest possible sine to square wave converter on my HP5313xA 
> counter time interval calibrator...  a capacitively coupled HCMOS gate 
> (74HC86) biased at VCC/2 with two 47K resistors as shown in the LPRO manual 
> and Wenzel's squarer page.  I was not expecting anything good, but was 
> pleasantly surprised.   Attached is a plot of the xDEVS using a TAPR TICC... 
> TICC clock was a 5071A 10 MHz,  chA input was the squared output of the 
> second 5071A output 10 MHz signal divided to 1PPS with a TADD2-mini.  The 
> squarer prototype was built on perf board using a DIP packaged part.
> 
> An update on the calibrator project:  I have the PCBs on order and they have 
> supposedly been shipped, but are taking their sweet time getting here from 
> China (despite paying for DHL 3 day shipping).  But, it looks like I need to 
> tweak the PCB since the rotary switches that I received do not match the 
> samples that I got... grrr...   I have found a local guy that may be able to 
> assemble the boards for a quite reasonable price and another place for a 
> semi-resonable price.
> 
> The same PCB order also included the boards for the X72 rubidium 
> interface.<cal.gif>_______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to