Hi Obviously you need two more 8607’s ….. :)
I suspect you are correct and the OCXO is doing better than the close in data suggests. Bob > On Feb 4, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote: > > FYI: here's an old plot where I evaluated an Oscilloquartz 8607 BVA against a > H-maser. It gets down to 8e-14 but is likely a bit better. On this plot, I > suspect the short-term numbers were not the BVA oscillator or the TSC 5110A > analyzer, but the H-maser. > > /tvb > <log37169v.gif>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- email@example.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.