Obviously you need two more 8607’s ….. :)
I suspect you are correct and the OCXO is doing better than the close in data
> On Feb 4, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote:
> FYI: here's an old plot where I evaluated an Oscilloquartz 8607 BVA against a
> H-maser. It gets down to 8e-14 but is likely a bit better. On this plot, I
> suspect the short-term numbers were not the BVA oscillator or the TSC 5110A
> analyzer, but the H-maser.
> time-nuts mailing list -- email@example.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.