Hystersis (exhibited by 74xx14 devices) results in AM to PM conversion which 
increases as the amount of hysteresis increases.


Bruce

> 
>     On 04 March 2018 at 10:34 Bruce Griffiths <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>     Ideally one should use a Collins style optimised cascade of increasing 
> bandwidth and gain limiting stages. The LTC6957 with its selectable input 
> stage bandwidth has a performance that is comparable with the Holzworth sine 
> to CMOS "amplifier" which is better than any comparator by itself. If the 
> amplitude of the input signal is large enough (i.e. input slew rate seen by 
> the gate is large enough) the performance of a single CMOS gate can be very 
> good. However the performance of current CMOS gates degrades in this 
> application with input frequencies of 100MHz and above.
> 
>     Measuring the PN performance of CMOS gates used as sine to CMOS 
> converters is on the todo list.
> 
>     Bruce
> 
>         > > 
> >         On 04 March 2018 at 06:38 "David C. Partridge" 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >         You might consider using MC74VHC1GT14 or MC74VHC1G14 (Schmitt 
> > trigger inverting buffers) depending on the exact voltage levels.
> > 
> >         They are fast (74AC logic fast) single gate devices in SC70 
> > (SOT-353) or SOT23-5 case and can drive 25mA output if needed.
> > 
> >         I've seen documents saying that using fast logic gates can result 
> > in lower jitter/phase noise. Bruce - do you know ?
> > 
> >         David
> > 
> >         -----Original Message-----
> >         From: time-nuts [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > Ulf Kylenfall via time-nuts
> >         Sent: 03 March 2018 17:08
> >         To: Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement
> >         Subject: [time-nuts] LT1016 as a pulse shaper...
> > 
> >         Gentlemen,
> >         I have so far been using LT1016 as a pulse shaper and also whenever 
> > I needed toconvert a sine wave into TTL Logic levels. Some hysteresis and 
> > all the decouplingand layout precautions as recommended by LT.
> >         Are there any similar or better alternatives out there that could 
> > be usedthat would provide lower jitter and that are less expenceive?
> >         Ulf Kylenfall
> >         SM6GXV
> > 
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to 
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >         and follow the instructions there.
> > 
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> >         To unsubscribe, go to 
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >         and follow the instructions there.
> > 
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> >         To unsubscribe, go to 
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> >         and follow the instructions there.
> > 
> >     > 
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to