Hi What, no 0.046 +/- -.002” vent hole?
That used to be a requirement on this sort of thing. Bob > On Dec 8, 2018, at 6:35 PM, jimlux <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/8/18 11:30 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> You might be surprised by how well the CSAC does in orbit. There have been a >> lot of cases >> over the years where a device has done much better once it is away from >> “poking fingers” >> like pressure and other semi-random stuff …. >> Bob > > Oh, I'm pretty sure it will do well in a very benign environment - I joked > with the reps that if we could figure out how to vent the enclosure after on > orbit, the whole "getter filling up" issue would go away. > > I don't know that I'll be able to measure the performance. We sort of added > it at the last minute, to be able to demonstrate the ability measure & > calibrate an OCXO without a GPS 1pps, and didn't give a huge amount of > thought to how to do real performance measurement. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
