On 25/01/2019 7:56 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
...
Doing a buy on the F9T might be easier if the part actually existed ….. Right
now it is still in the
vaporware phase.
Bob
So if there's someone they'd listen to, it's not too late to see if
there's features from the various time-nuts F9P posts that ublox would add?
And if they're listening, given the number of users in high-multipath
environments due to limited skyviews, for firmware that is aimed at
fixed-position usages, I'd like to see:
o the min elevation have a matching max elevation
o an azimuth range, starting to ending, to exclude sats not in that range
That should be just as fast in execution as the current min-elevation
setting?
The ability to specify a sat to exclude from the solution would be very
useful. Then at least we could monitor the list of sats, their elevation
& azimuth and issue a command to exclude one that isn't in our skyview.
Much neater to have the max elevation and azimuth range as above.
A much less common benefit of a specific sat exclusion is: it would
allow us to exclude a sat when it's passing behind the known position of
an interfering object in our skyview. I have two transformers on poles
I'd love to remove.
Michael
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
