At 11:33 AM -0400 2005-09-08, Eugene Smiley wrote:
It's actually already in place. Foe example, if you are working on
server in us.pool.ntp.org then the 4 servers are:
us.pool.ntp.org
1.us.pool.ntp.org
2.us.pool.ntp.org
3.us.pool.ntp.org
There is no 3. numbered sub-zone in any of the pool.ntp.org
zones. They are instead numbered 0-2. Moreover, the same servers
are used in the parent zone as well as in the numbered sub-zones, so
there's a good chance that you'll get a duplicate record.
The OP was asking if it made sense to also include an explicit 3.
sub-zone, at least in the zones where it makes sense, so that we can
make sure that there is no duplication between any of the numbered
sub-zones and that this will give us the minimum four upstream time
servers that are needed to be able to deal with a single falseticker.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
