They're BOTH wrong but I think we should protect innocent users. Like for example debian has only one server configured by default.
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 04:21:56PM -0400, Paul-Andrew Joseph Miseiko wrote: > That's not the fault of the person running 82.94.242.182, that's the fault > of the clueless user. In respect to "uplink goes bad", it does not matter > how many servers you have in your peer list if your uplink "goes bad". > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > > >>>82.94.242.182 syncs against only 2 timesources! > >>So? > >>Normally better servers will be elected oevr this one. > >>Or maybe the sysop of that IP will make changes? > > > >If a clueless users syncs to him (m/f) and that servers uplink goes bad > >the server won't notice and the client will have bad time. Folkert van Heusden -- Try MultiTail! Multiple windows with logfiles, filtered with regular expressions, colored output, etc. etc. www.vanheusden.com/multitail/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get your PGP/GPG key signed at www.biglumber.com! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
