On Feb 8, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Chris Hastie wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Jeff wrote
Isn't that how things *used* to be, and it was abandoned because
ntpd can't cope with having so many servers configed?
Yeah... the point isn't that it matters for any one server... the
point is that it seems to be the monitoring server that's off in
lala- land.
That's hardly fair. One single monitoring server can not be
expected to have decent delays to everywhere in the world. What's
needed if this really is a problem (and I'm not convinced) is
multiple, geographically distributed monitoring servers.
It's entirely fair, and entirely true -- that one server is having
issues with the network talking to every server.... but you've also
given the answer to the problem: distributed servers.
-Jeff
SIG: HUP
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
