-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi again,

Seems there are still some good guys out there, here is the reply i got
from the abusive client ...

>
> I've noted some interesting behaviour that you may want to look in to.
> One of the machines that was responsible for hammering your server was
> running Gentoo. The operator of this machines had enabled ntpd, both
> client and server. Stopping the server portion effectively stopped the
> over-zealous ntp traffic. What I don't understand is why the ntp daemon
> felt the need to hammer your servers (one machine at a rate of about 4
> requests/second). Both machines were using the stock /etc/ntpd.conf as
> far as I could tell, so you may want to bring this up in a Gentoo forum
> somewhere.
>

Now, I am not entirely up to scratch with the default behavior of NTP,
so could someone help explain this behavior?  Could it be a firewall
blocking the replies as you mentioned and that would cause the server to
try again?

Johan

Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> 
> On Apr 25, 2006, at 1:57 AM, Johan Lindquist wrote:
> 
>>> True, but if it is simply a firewall issue, then this should probably
>>> make it into the usage document perhaps?
> 
> I'd guess that the people who aren't noticing their time not being set
> wouldn't notice the note on our site either.
> 
> 
>  - ask
> 
> --
> http://askask.com/  - http://develooper.com/
> 
> 

- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEUHcR1Tv8wj7aQ34RAsCPAJsGKntgXYvbB7kmDSLoW1/JkgCbpACcCdG/
eWh58CtUjtb2rcxxgbCEr1c=
=2kDx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to