On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:46:38 -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, the code should be converting it to an absolute offset. > >"-2 * $offset_abs + 1" is, currently, the calculation that kicks in >when the offset is more than 0.075 seconds. Hmm.. All I can offer in rejoinder is some data from the .csv file: >1204056117,"2008-02-26 20:01:57",-0.149893641471863,0.700212717056274,10.1 >1204054368,"2008-02-26 19:32:48",-0.150670409202576,0.698659181594849,9.9 >1204052746,"2008-02-26 19:05:46",-0.151970148086548,0.696059703826904,9.7 >1204051246,"2008-02-26 18:40:46",-0.146223902702332,0.707552194595337,9.5 >1204049500,"2008-02-26 18:11:40",-0.154271364212036,0.691457271575928,9.2 >1204047755,"2008-02-26 17:42:35",0.0667705535888672,1,9 >1204046107,"2008-02-26 17:15:07",0.316627502441406,0.366744995117188,8.4 >1204044368,"2008-02-26 16:46:08",0.321823477745056,0.356353044509888,8.5 >1204042533,"2008-02-26 16:15:33",0.314275026321411,0.371449947357178,8.6 Absolute value of offset is > .1, yet score goes up. > Yes, maybe it should be >more aggressive. That seems like a good threshold to me, but there are signs that the code doesn't quite do what it should. _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
