On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Jeff Woolsey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your reaches are even smaller now! We can't really draw conclusions
> from single data points. I'm not sure what the jitter of one point
> means. You're using iburst, though, so maybe that accounts for it.
i rm'd iburst from my /etc/ntp.conf last eve, and the box has run
since then ... atm, i've
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
+zorro.sf-bay.or 216.218.254.202 2 u 23 64 77 24.220 -829.09 493.664
*AC-NTP0.net.cmu 128.237.148.140 2 u 33 64 77 80.883 -807.14 491.659
+AC-NTP1.net.cmu 128.237.148.140 2 u 48 64 37 85.234 -772.44 404.404
AC-NTP2.net.cmu 128.237.148.132 2 u 53 64 17 82.856 -761.93 313.603
+clock.sjc.he.ne .CDMA. 1 u 2 64 77 15.860 -879.75 484.443
reach of 77, and jitters ~ 400.
i admit, given this flopping around of data, i've no clue what's
good/correct/etc.
how _does_ one evaluate if ntp's functioning ok or not? some
combination of data & vehavior over time, i'm sure ...
thanks.
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
