On Friday 11 May 2007 3:01 pm, Dave Dodge wrote: > Aside: from a purely C standpoint the memcpy() solution isn't actually > guaranteed to work either, thanks to C99's concept of padding bits. I > don't know of any real hardware where it would actually break, though, > and if such a system does exist it's almost certainly some weird > DSP/ASIC where if you're writing code for it you already know about > these issues.
What are "padding bits"? I strongly suspect this isn't something Linux has to worry about... Rob _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
