On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:36 pm, Dave Dodge wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:36:20PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Friday 11 May 2007 3:01 pm, Dave Dodge wrote: > > > Aside: from a purely C standpoint the memcpy() solution isn't actually > > > guaranteed to work either, thanks to C99's concept of padding bits. > > > > What are "padding bits"?
[cut explanation of padding bits] Ok, now I'm SURE I don't care. :) Rob _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
