hi, would be nice if it would build with pelles c as well
http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/ regards, --jo 2007/8/27, Peter Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 00:21 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > I'm all for improving the config and the makefiles (they need it), but I > don't > > personally consider autoconf or automake to be an improvement. > > Thank you! > > That makes me feel safer about the project. > > I tried as an experiment last year to see how far I could get without > using any kind of configure script, just with a GNU makefile (*). It > turns out that one get everything auto* gives you plus it is faster, > more user friendly, more programmer friendly and doesn't result in > (extremely!) big configure shell scripts. > > > *) It has cached feature tests and header dependency tests. There are > commands (make targets) to list the caches and to flush them etc. > I /could/ make it generate a "config.h" file but it is cleaner to rely > on standards for the most part and a few -Dxxx=yyy parameters to the > compiler for the rest. > > -Peter > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
