Sanghyeon Seo wrote: > 2007/10/27, Daniel P. Stasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> With Rob Landley quitting and now deleting his own tinycc repository, >> is there any other site that hosts all the known patches and/or >> tarball.
Speaking as a lurker... Now that Mercurial isn't a do-or-die requirement on the part of the maintainer, is it possible that the tcc community go back to the official repository? David Wheeler already has access to it. Lots of CVS/SVN users still get by... We should stick to simple tools and keep the community together with the least amount of strife. It's not a terribly big community. The community should look towards getting a maintainer who will do stable and long-term work, and adopt a conciliatory stance towards developers who work on non-FLOSS operating systems, however unacceptable some people perceive them to be. The tcc community should build something that moves tcc forward, rather than spend all the energy getting hot under the collar on issues that does not help the development of tcc. Just my 2 cents. I am looking forward to see 0.9.24. :-) > I have a clean checkout, which thanks to the distributed nature of > Mercurial, is as good as the repository itself. > [snip] -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
