[sorry if this is sent twice, I'm in between switching e-mails] Sanghyeon Seo wrote: > 2007/10/27, Kein-Hong Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Speaking as a lurker... Now that Mercurial isn't a do-or-die >> requirement on the part of the maintainer, is it possible that the >> tcc community go back to the official repository? David Wheeler >> already has access to it. Lots of CVS/SVN users still get by... > > What's wrong with Mercurial?
The official repository is not Mercurial, I believe. There is no reason to continue with another "fork" now, is there? Given a choice of (1) starting another Mercurial repository of tcc or (2) working with the official repository and aim for a 0.9.24 release, as a fairly neutral bystander, I definitely prefer to see the latter. It will also make the work of all the package maintainers easier, no more ambiguity. The bigger issue is not which repository to use, it is for someone experienced to step up to lead and move the project forward and stick to it for some time. Since tcc itself does not have any religious issues to stop it from becoming a single entity again, an inclusive stance would be nice. The lowest common denominator is probably not sexy for some people, but it provides the lowest barrier to participation. -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
