Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > KHMan wrote: >> so for the third time, I'd say >> that we now need someone to take some kind of lead... > > what for? wikis also work without having somebody declared as "the > leader". why shouldn't this work for code as well?
Gee, more nitpicking. You *did* say there is a need for a "common denominator". So, I assume there should be postings, talk, action and eventually the list would *in* *theory* move towards some kind of "common denominator" repository, right? And normally there are some sort of owners, right, even for wikis? Not everybody is going to get commit access, right? There will be person(s) to send patches to, right? If there is a FLOSS project where commit access is *totally* open like a wiki, please let me know, it would be an interesting factoid to know. How should I word things without more of this kind of pointless nitpicking? There seem to be more landmines here than a WWII minefield. Never mind, I have a really thick skin, and I will indulge some of you guys for a while. So -- how shall I say it -- "perhaps" someone might "declare" a Mercurial host (or equivalent) open for business in the near future, and maybe a wiki (or equivalent) as well. (I assume most on the list is not keen on Nick's SVN repo.) These are all community "action" items, and as far as I can tell, they all require some level of commitment from someone, somewhere. I was just wondering aloud when a commitment will appear. That's reasonable, right? That was all I was suggesting/wondering/hoping/pondering. Really. Do lay off the Red Bull. :-) -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
