KHMan wrote: > If there is a FLOSS project where commit access > is *totally* open like a wiki, please let me know, it would be an > interesting factoid to know.
Yes, git/repo.or.cz has this "mob" branch which is open for anonymous pushing. I like this idea and I think this could turn out to be a beneficial development model. It could also be horrible, sure. I didn't want to bring up the topic of hg vs git, but there is a public git hosting site (repo.or.cz) which helps making progress without somebody dedicated providing the infrastructure. > So -- how shall I say it -- "perhaps" someone might "declare" a > Mercurial host (or equivalent) open for business in the near > future, and maybe a wiki (or equivalent) as well. (I assume most > on the list is not keen on Nick's SVN repo.) These are all > community "action" items, and as far as I can tell, they all > require some level of commitment from someone, somewhere. I was > just wondering aloud when a commitment will appear. That's > reasonable, right? Sure, and I appreciate your interest. Although we might not share the opinion on how the access to the code should be structured, we are at least performing some sort of community activity. A meta-activity, granted, but still. Don't get me wrong, this is not personal. It's just about the conceptual model of code access. You propose a single authority, I propose a completely distributed model where maybe eventually there will be one repo which a fraction of the users will consider as "current" or "stable" "enough". cheers simon _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
