Joshua Phillips wrote: > oh, well, it seems they don't officially support it, but it's still possible: > http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/MercurialOnSourceforge > > On Wednesday 31 October 2007 17:37:03 Gregg Reynolds wrote: >> On 10/31/07, Joshua Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> SourceForge supports Mercurial >> Not according to their documentation. Do you have a link?
Interesting. According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_software_hosting_facilities git/hg support looks spotty for now... At the moment, it looks like there is ShareSource and Alioth for public Mercurial hosting, or a DIY approach such as the above can be taken. While it is not explicitly disallowed in: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4297&group_id=1 It would be only polite to ask permission to do this sort of thing. Is this method explicitly allowed by the SF people? I've heard of projects being notified that they are not supposed to be pushing binaries or source tarballs out of there... To make discussion easier, here are the relevant pages on public hosting for hg/git: http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/ProjectsUsingMercurial http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitProjects So -- hypothetically -- if we adopt distributed development of tcc using hg, will this mean that by the openly distributed model, we expect to have a group of developers who maintain repositories that are public-access, so that A can pull from B or C or D at any time? -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
