Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> Could a C guru out there please tell me why the following works? Extra points
> if you can explain why it makes sense.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(){
> int arr[10];
> printf("%d\n",sizeof arr[0]); // ok
> printf("%d\n",sizeof(arr[0])); // ok
> printf("%d\n",sizeof(arr)[0]); // ok, but why?
> return 0;
> }
I think it is some kind of precedence rule. sizeof after all is an
operator and not a function. Seems that [] is binding stronger than sizeof.
cheers
simon
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
