On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > Le samedi 21 septembre 2013 00:02:58 Jared Maddox a ?crit : > > > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:50:28 +0200 > > > From: Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes > > > Message-ID: <1975955.xx8PpmsNzB@cerclon> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > > Le vendredi 20 septembre 2013 03:08:10 Sylvain BERTRAND a ?crit : > > >> Hi, [.. snip ..] > > > > So the GCC C compiler even depends on C++ features now? I had thought > > they were planning to keep the "core" set of compilers as C-based. A > > shame. > > Yes, see http://lwn.net/Articles/542457/
Interesting, it is based on what is popular at any given moment. But, http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html tells me they got it wrong. Someone probably should consider php or python; there is a real chance any of those could be #1 in the near future. John _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
