On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> wrote: > Le lundi 23 septembre 2013 14:31:04 Vittorio Giovara a écrit : >> >> In my opinion, tinycc can remain without optimizations because it is >> not one of the compiler design goals. >> However there is one optimization that's more like a feature these >> days: dead code elimination. >> There are quite a few programs that completely rely on that and when >> compiled with tcc plainly fail with a 'undefined symbol' error for >> functions that are actually unused. >> >> It would be really nice to have some compiler switch (if not >> integrated) that enable this functionality. > > Patches are welcome :)
Umh, why not, can you give me a few pointers? Never touched compiler code so in depth, I'll need some hand-holding ;) Vittorio _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
