Hi. grischka <gris...@gmx.de> wrote: |grischka wrote: |Now, I fixed that, plus the ARM signed char test, plus some other |stuff. | |Also, I removed the win32/Makefile (thanks to Christian's OK), |and the VIP patch (it is just not how it should work), and the |-iwithprefix option (what was the point without -iprefix). | |Moreover, there is |* a patch to tccelf.c to avoid DT_TEXTREL unless really required |* a nifty one in tccasm.c to avoid the 'p3' forward label from | alloca86_64.S being put into dynsym with a relocation (huh?) |* and the (sig)set variable in tcctest.c was made static to | avoid some issue with inline asm that I didn't try to fix |* no diff -I option anymore to make tests work with busybox |* a patch to tccrun.c for better selinux support. | |With these changes, tcc now seems to build and pass all tests |cleanly on Alpine musl x86_64 standard-grsec and vanilla too, |configured with | ./configure --config-musl --with-selinux |optionally also with | --disable-static and/or --cc=tcc (once it was installed)
Does not work for me at all on musl system: ?0[steffen@essex tmp]$ ldd zt ldd: zt: Not a valid dynamic program As well as: ?0[steffen@essex nail.git]$ make make[1]: Entering directory '/home/steffen/src/nail.git' CC accmacvar.o In file included from ./accmacvar.c:52: In file included from ./nail.h:2615: ./nailfuns.h:425: error: invalid type make[1]: *** [mk-config.mk:120: accmacvar.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/steffen/src/nail.git' make: *** [makefile:20: build] Error 2 ?2[steffen@essex nail.git]$ sed -e 425p -e d nailfuns.h FL void n_verr(char const *format, va_list ap); and even worse: ?0[steffen@essex nail.git]$ tcc -print-search-dirs install: /home/steffen/usr/opt/tcc/lib/tcc include: /home/steffen/usr/include /home/steffen/usr/include /usr/local/include /usr/include /home/steffen/usr/opt/tcc/lib/tcc/include Quite honestly i am pissed. How can stdarg.h ever be found here when there is one in /usr/include? If this is not supposed to work like that, why provide stdarg.h at all? Are there systems without stdarg.h in /usr/include? See, i do not know. You gave that token thing maybe "hint", but why should this be handled in compiler internal code when all that is missing is inclusion of a compiler/ABI specific header first? That is the road to hell! Note that i never was actually interested in compiler or kernel programming. Actually not true, but i never found time to come down to this, as there was always other code i had to deal with and wanted to get straight. But if i had, i would really dig into the problems and find a solution of my own, how tiny and/or ridiculous that would have been -- as if given an exercise by Knuth: write an operating system. I cannot spend time on tcc, i just have none. I admire there is tcc, and pcc, and people working on them. But you are active in this project for a decade and a half or so, at least, you know the code or even saw it growing, live, i did not. And then i nonetheless spent more than two hours trying to inject code, which was a total waste of time. Maybe some day i will have the time to do that, but i have other projects that i want to take care of and, differently to tcc, can do so. Thank you. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel