Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > (Keep in mind the goals for tcc: > simple with a high compilation speed)
+1 On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 08:34:00AM -0400, John Mastronardo via Tinycc-devel wrote: > Strive for a fully compatible C99, published as a stable C99 1.0 release as > soon as possible. Call this your “production” C compiler, always available > for download, just as on the Fabrice Bellard website. Then, separately, > continue to build in C11 compatibility with ongoing “test” releases. That > way, at least, programmers can depend on their code always compiling properly > using your 1.0 compiler, while work is later being done on your C11 release. +1 Predictability of the compiler's behaviour is valuable by itself. A presence of a "stable" version maintained with bugfixes (remaining deviations from C99 could be seen as bugs) would bring additional value immediately. /tccm _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
