On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 22:10 +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-08-13 at 15:33 -0400, J Mastron via Tinycc-devel wrote:
> > I think the discussion is getting to a very good place.
> > 
> > For me, the clearest definition of TCC 1.0 would be complete
> > implementation of the C11 standard, including its optional language
> > and library features. Define the supported targets and operating
> > systems, make the C11 baseline explicit, and then we know exactly
> > what “1.0” means.
> > 
> > Of course, 1.0 is a milestone, not a retirement party. After that,
> > development should continue indefinitely with new architectures,
> > extensions, optimizations and bug fixes. 1.0 doesn’t have to mean
> > “finished forever.” It means that TCC has reached a well-defined,
> > reliable production baseline.
> > 
> > And that brings me back to the original point: 0.9.27 was released
> > on December 17, 2017. We’re now nearly nine years beyond that, yet
> > 0.9.27 remains the official production release.
> 
> But the world wide web carry newer variants of tcc.

in my /usr/src/Lang/tinyc-mirror I have

% cat .git/config 
[core]
repositoryformatversion = 0
filemode = true
bare = false
logallrefupdates = true
[remote "origin"]
url = https://github.com/Tiny-C-Compiler/tinycc-mirror-repository
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
[branch "mob"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/mob

-- 

Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[email protected]>
8 rue de la Faïencerie http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ 
92340 Bourg-la-Reine https://github.com/bstarynk
France https://github.com/RefPerSys/RefPerSys
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-5250
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to