I've been testing online for few weeks. As for accessibility, It's been quite OK. I can access it. Reliability, not certain, as it is tested scarcely.
As for performance, the GTK client is a faster, which is quite expected. However, for daily usage, the responsiveness of both clients is not acceptable when using the scenario of a single centralized server accessed by various clients through the internet. It seems like, the data to be transferred is quite a lot, especially since the form definition has to transferred all the time. To improve the performance we could: - equip the GTK client with a cache to store most of the forms definition. The cache is always used, except when new version of the form comes out. - zip the data - Use server cache to store ready-made form definition, so that the orm read function doesn't have to be called all the time. I found that this function have to execute tens thousands of lines of code (using trace.py). For current situation, it seems like there should be a local server, synchronized with the centralized server. -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openerp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=28126#28126 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users
