Hi Alex -- I disabled traceroute in this version of blip -- the motes
don't send the ICMP time exceeded messages which are necessary for it.
 Two reasons -- (1) sometimes routing loops lead to a lot of dropped
packets and so a lot of errors, which just make things works, and (2)
I didn't want to use the code space.  Sorry about that!

Best,
Steve

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Alex FP <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear John.
>
> Thanks for you support, I appreciate so much your help.
>
>
> I am using the UDPEcho app + Ppproute app , and until this moment I've
> testing with two hops (from fec0::100 to fec0::4)
>
> PC(fec0::100)-->node1(fec0::1,sink_node)-->node7(fec0::7)-->node4(fec0::4);
> fec0::100 and fec0::1 with USB connection.
>
> This test is in a considerable distance, I am making pings to fec0::4 and I
> am getting the reply from it; and when  the node7 is removed, which is in
> the middle (fec0::7) the communication is lost.
>
> But I don't understand why when in the PC write the  traceroute6 command
> don't appears each node where pass the packets?
>
>
>
> root@acp:/opt/tinyos-2.x.svn/apps# tracert6 fec0::4
> traceroute to fec0::4 (fec0::4) from fec0::100, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>  1  * * *
>  2  * * *
>  3  fec0::4 (fec0::4)  97.768 ms  * 83.826 ms
>
>
>
> root@acp:/opt/tinyos-2.x.svn/apps# tracert6 fec0::7
>
> traceroute to fec0::7 (fec0::7) from fec0::100, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>  1  * * *
>  2  * * fec0::7 (fec0::7)  57.774 ms
>  3  fec0::7 (fec0::7)  61.834 ms  * 56.148 ms
>
>
> I am doing something bad or must use other command?
>
>
> Yours faithfully,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:42 PM, JeongGil Ko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Alex,
>>
>> Looks like you are on the right page :)
>>
>> -John
>>
>> ------
>> JeongGil Ko
>> Ph.D. Candidate
>> Department of Computer Science
>> Johns Hopkins University
>> http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~jgko
>>
>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alex FP wrote:
>>
>> > Dear John.
>> >
>> > Thanks again for your answer.
>> >
>> > I was checking UDPEchoC.nc and appears:
>> > .....
>> > #ifdef RPL_ROUTING
>> >   components RPLRoutingC;
>> > #endif
>> > ....
>> >
>> > Also in its  UDPEchoC's Makefile.  Here is specified is using  RPL, and
>> > is enable with this line:
>> >
>> > PFLAGS += -DRPL_ROUTING -DRPL_STORING_MODE -I$(TOSDIR)/lib/net/rpl
>> >
>> > Then, must I understand is working y default the RPL? But before this
>> > must I add to the UDPEcho's Makefile this:
>> >
>> > CFLAGS+=-DRPL_ROOT_ADDR=3
>> >
>> > Where 3 is the ID of the mote that is installed the Ppproute app on it.
>> >
>> > .. And also make match the channels in both Ppproute's Makefile and
>> > UDPEcho's  Makefile  (for telosb), for example:
>> >
>> > CFLAGS += -DCC2420_DEF_CHANNEL=25
>> >
>> > All this is correct?
>> >
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Alex.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help



-- 
stephen dawson-haggerty
http://cs.berkeley.edu/~stevedh
uc berkeley wireless and embedded systems lab
berkeley, ca 94720

_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to