Well, I suppose it wouldn't do any good to suggest that, whatever
the organization or the journal that prints it, that the article
be considered on its merits.
I did note (if you read my post) that the information in the article was most likely scientifically valid. It just seems that this journal is selecting not on that basis but rather on the basis finding evidence of the error of feminism's ways and in the service of painting all causes allied with feminism (treated as a kind of "dirty word") with the same broad brush. I know the APA has problems of this nature; I don't think to the same degree or with the same consistency. And problems with the APA are (although I note the tongue and cheek aspect of the commentary) not relevant to the point.
Nancy Melucci
The livening it up gal
and a feminist too.
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
