I was thinking of parsimony and consistency with data, myself. Honestly,
though, I haven't read the book and should do so.


At 8:07 AM -0600 1/8/02, Mike Scoles wrote:
>By what criterion are you judging other explanations to be "better?"  An
>evolutionary explanation would appear to be more parsimonious.
>
>Faith Florer wrote:
>
>> I agree that we discount the role of biology far too often.
>>
>> However, I still don't accept the evolutionary perspective if it states
>> that genetic relatedness somehow leads to more altruism or less violence.
>> All of the  genetic relatedness statements I've seen on this list could be
>> explained without the evolutionary perspective better.
>>
>> For example, the studies looking at wills don't split out biological from
>> adoptive parents. (Paperwork is changed when babies are adopted to make the
>> babies look biologically related.) The studies about boy babies don't seem
>> take into account the differences in fragility and difficulty of boys
>> versus girl babies. (I dimly remember that boy babies are more likely to
>> die in all households.) The stuff about maternal closeness doesn't take
>> into account the social closeness of mothers to children.  (You'd likely
>> find the same closeness to maternal families when adoptions occur.) The
>> strongest arguments for evolutionary caring seem to come from data on step
>> parenting, which have  a lot of problems. As Herb Coleman pointed out, it
>> would be extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible, to control for all
>> of the factors that lead to a step parent taking on the role of a parent.
>>
>> Finally, I would bet that social workers etc. would be more likely to look
>> for and call children 'abused' by nonbiological relatives.
>
>*****************************************************************
>* Mike Scoles                      *    [EMAIL PROTECTED]   *
>* Department of Psychology         *    voice: (501) 450-5418   *
>* University of Central Arkansas   *    fax:   (501) 450-5424   *
>* Conway, AR    72035-0001         *                            *
>********* http://www.coe.uca.edu/psych/scoles/index.html ********
>
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


phone: 914-738-1147
fax: 914-738-1078



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to