Here is my two cents

At the risk of sounding extreme, I'd also suggest to your wife that she look
into making a complaint via her university's violence prevention response
team.  There should be a formal program that includes a mechanism for
reporting incidents of threatening behavior.  If there is a threat
assessment team/incident response team, it would be a mistake to fail to
alert them to a situation like this, which could escalate if the student
feels that her grievance was not properly discharged.

The university is bound by law (OSHA's general duty clause, and possibly
local statutes) to provide a safe workplace for her (and all employees), and
they are liable if negligent in that area.

Disgruntled students have been known to be violent (just to mention one:
University of Iowa, Nov. 1991 - a student, Gang Lu, killed two professors
and a student, who received a prize and stipend that Lu felt he should have
received, just after initiating a grievance on the issue), and campuses are
know for a high potential for violence.  In addition, you may not know if
this student has any history of violence or emotional instability.  Her
history of litigious behavior with the zoo, and documented threats like
"I'll take her down," should be sufficient for the university to, at
minimum, regard this as a potentially threatening situation and be prepared.

They should take her threats (along with some of the other behaviors she
seems to have) as "red flags" for potential violence and perform a threat
assessment.  It is to their best interest as the university will be held
liable if this student acts aggressively and they failed to protect all
parties.

If, as a result of the grievance process, the student does not get what she
wants, the school should be prepared to respond to any possible reaction
from her.  Nobody wants to predict the worse but I would not overlook this
since this student seems to perceive that she has been "wronged" somehow,
and that is often sufficient reason to be vigilant.

Good luck

Haydee Gelpi
Broward Community College
Florida

-----Original Message-----
From: James D.Dougan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: Help requested with an ugly legal issue

TIPsters,

I am hoping that someone out there might have some advice regarding a very
sticky and ugly university-related legal issue.  Below is a summary of the
relevant details.  For the record, I am writing this on behalf of my wife -
she is too embarrassed and too upset to do anything at the moment.

My wife is a tenured and award winning professor at a local state
university.  In fact, she was just awarded the university's highest
teaching award.  This is just to establish that we are not talking about
someone with a spotty record.

As part of her research, my wife collects data on animal behavior at a
local zoo.  Both undergraduate and graduate students assist her.  One of
the graduate students was eventually hired by the zoo as an employee -
while still remaining in graduate school.  Recently, that student filed
sexual harassment charges against an employee at the zoo.  As far as we
know, the charges were dismissed as groundless (though to be honest we
don't know the details because we were not involved).  Note that my wife
had absolutely no administrative relationship with the zoo and absolutely
no control - supervisory or otherwise - over the student as an employee at
the zoo.  The zoo is simply a place where she and her students collect
data, and a place where the student in question had become an employee.

At around the same time, my wife was getting increasingly frustrated with
the graduate student's progress in the program.  One problem is that the
student has never written a thesis proposal - even though some of the data
collected at the zoo were initially intended for inclusion in a thesis.  My
wife informed the student that she was not to collect any more data at the
zoo until she completed her proposal.  As soon as the proposal is written
and approved, the student can resume data collection.  If my wife has done
anything wrong, it was to allow any data to be collected before the
proposal is written.  As it is, she has simply informed the student that
she has to write the proposal before continuing.

The student became very angry at this.  She has now filed formal charges
against my wife with the affirmative action office on campus.  The
charge?  That my wife was "retaliating" against the student for filing
sexual harassment charges against he employee at the zoo.

There are many many many reasons why these charges are simply absurd.  Two
stand out, though:

1)  How can my wife be retaliating when she has no relationship with the
person actually charged?  Apparently, this is "retaliation by proxy" - that
is, my wife is apparently retaliating on behalf of someone else.

2)  How is it retaliation to require a student to write a thesis proposal -
something which is required for all thesis students?

A couple of other relevant facts:

-- The student has a history of personal issues and previous interpersonal
problems

-- The student has refused mediation, insisting on filing formal charges
without first going that step

-- The student has told people "I am going to take her down..." and made
other threatening statements.

That's the jist of it.  There are lots of other details, but that is most
of it.

Here is the problem:  The University is taking the charges seriously and
proceeding with an investigation.  Further, they apparently think that
their role is to advocate for the student, and that they have no
requirement to support the faculty member.  We have also been told that
anything we do against the student - such as filing a restraining order
after the student has made threats - would be considered further
retaliation.  It seems that my wife is being asked to prove herself
innocent- that she is assumed to be guilty before things even begin.

We have had to hire an attorney at our own expense - and the attorney says
this could get pretty costly.

I like to believe in the system enough to think that this will eventually
be resolved - that the charges will be recognized as absurd.  I would like
to think that would have occurred already.  But, nothing will apparently be
resolved until we have spent a lot of money and gone through a lot of
stress. In the mean time we really feel like our family is potentially in
danger.

So - does ANYONE have any advice?  How do you defend yourself against such
charges?

Thanks in advance....

-- Jim Dougan

















---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to