Paul Smith wrote: > In many of the cases raised as "proof of irreducible > complexity", evolutionary scientists have already established > satisfactory answers, which are then ignored completely by > "intelligent design theorists", because they know that their > argument sounds convincing especially in light of those examples.
> "Unbridgeable"? Evolutionary theorists have already "bridged" the > examples given in some of the standard "ID" objections, but of course > again the "ID theorists" continue to use those examples. Paul: Would you please provide some specific examples to support your assertions? What are the specific "satisfactory answers" that evolutionary scientists have established in response to the irreducible complexity examples asserted by intelligent design theorists? This is not my area of specialty and I would be interested in your expertise. Thanks in advance. Rod ______________________________________________ Roderick D. Hetzel, Ph.D. Department of Psychology LeTourneau University Post Office Box 7001 2100 South Mobberly Avenue Longview, Texas 75607-7001 Office: Heath-Hardwick Hall 115 Phone: 903-233-3312 Fax: 903-233-3246 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.letu.edu/people/rodhetzel --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 2/19/2002 --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
