>In other words, if we find any difference between the two groups, the >"believer" can say "God did intervene because that is how God intervenes."
This is always the problem with mixing science and religion. A miracle can always be invoked post hoc to account for any outcome. The basic underlying assumptions are too different. >>Charles Darwin argued against this belief > >The great theologian ;) I believe that he was professionally qualified in this area ;-) * PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Psychology Dept Minnesota State University, Mankato * * 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 * * http://www.mankato.msus.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html * --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
